.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Sight Screen

Friday, September 23, 2005

Addendum

Jaggu Dalmiya's arguments get curioser and curioser. Thus, here:
But Dalmiya was not short of words either. "Who has made the arrangements for the additional two observers? Who has paid for their airfares and arranged their stay in this hotel?" he asked, hinting, not so subtly, that the observers might be biased to the opposition.

Did you read that right? Oh you sure did -- JD is suggesting that the court-appointed observers might have been bought over by the opposition.
Begs a counter question: Who is paying for the observer the court first appointed, following a petition filed by your own crony in the Kolkata High Court, JD-saab? The BCCI? So wouldn't the BCCI also be paying for the other two observers, who after all are court appointees -- and not Pawar appointees?
Innuendo is a neat little weapon, saab -- but must you fire off such misguided missiles?

2 Comments:

  • this is what I mean by Dalmiya having brass balls: "Dalmiya said "people say BCCI is the best administered Board but whatever has happened in the last few days is not good. We are a role model only on paper."

    http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/000200509232001.htm

    who says the BCCI is the best administred board? I've never heard anybody say that. Have you?

    By Blogger roublen, at 11:47  

  • JD looks to be stretched right now. I wonder if he'll have enough time or motivation to support SG during all this. If not, SG is screwed :)

    By Blogger Toney, at 11:52  

Post a Comment

<< Home